The Little Dead Polar Bear

by Sarmad - February 3rd, 2007
why read this?!fairly good.interesting...GREAT READ!oh give us MORE of this!!! ( 1 votes, average: 4 / 5 )
Loading ... Loading ...

As we move closer to the penultimate month in the Baha’i calendar, the month wherein the birds, species by species, begin to announce the glad tidings that the month of fasting is approaching, I have noticed that this is going to be the second year in my life that there has been no winter.

The first was in the 1980s (it was a freak year), but this time, moving from autumn to spring with nary a snow, I suspect that this may be a worrying trend; one that is likely to repeat itself with increasing frequency. Goodbye to the winters! The consequence of this is horrifying. For instance, a hedgehog will wake up in January and starve to death. Entire ecosystems will be disrupted. (Not that very many people care, as a recent discussion regarding vegetarianism on the BBC website suggested).

One of the most haunting images in my imagination is regarding the polar bear, who, it is claimed, will face extinction if the summer Arctic sea-ice disappears in the next 50 years. I imagine starving animals leaping from ice-lump to lump, the lumps increasingly small and increasingly disparate. Never mind whether London will be flooded by the new sea level, or whether there will be no more beaches; don’t think too much about the additional disaster that might come if that iceshelf in Antartica fell into the sea (there might be a real Waterworld), or if all the ice in Greenland melts; and don’t think too much about the theoretical possibility that rising sea temperatures might cause the seabed to release its stores of carbon, leading eventually to a runaway greenhouse effect like they had on Venus a while back. No, the only image that matters is the one of the Little Dead Polar Bear; because if this doesn’t worry you (and it worries almost no one), then predictions of all the other disasters that might befall us cannot possibly mean a thing.

9 Responses to “The Little Dead Polar Bear”

  1. Sanisha says:

    honestly, I care about the starving hedgehog and the extinction of the animals but I don’t worry because I feel there is nothing I can do about it.What can we, ordinary feeble people, possibly do? People in Africa, and in Asia ?

    As childish as this will sound >> I want to express that I am actually angry, I am angry at you guys. I should not be feeling guilt at the death of the polar bear.You should.Most of the world can’t do much to change the situation so It is up to you, people in the West.YOU should be worried, because only you have the resources to actually fix/save it.

  2. Sarmad says:

    I agree 100% with this. And it is the people who are not in the West who will actually suffer the most when the climate catastrophe takes root.

    Only global governance will sort it out!

  3. Saleem says:

    Firstly, Sanisha’s conception of “us” and “them” might reflect political realities, but it does not reflect spiritual realities. And global governance is not the solution, it is the default result of a single consciousness worldwide, the elimination of Us and Them, the unity of mankind. Finally, on a very pragmatic note, global warming may have been initiated and precipitated by the West, but it is China and India that must now join with the West to make any impact on controlling emissions through international agreement. The developing world is as culpable in the next century as has been the developed in the last, if not more so.

  4. Sanisha says:

    that makes sense Saleem, it is childish to think of ‘us’ and ‘them’ but in pragmatic terms…who will put the polar bear on the agenda? I don’t think you can count on the Chinese seeing as the East pays absurd amounts of money to eat Shark fins, tuna, whales, sturgeon, abalone.It’s up to you, the West to make sure that the Environment is a top priority.Similarly for controlling emissions, I think.We trust you.

  5. Saleem says:

    No no no. This supposed eastern taste for shark fins is besides the point. One fifth of carbon emissions comes form global livestock production, and the west sure likes its beef. My point is, culpability is universal now. Further, the great metric of Chinese motivations shouldn’t be the menu in a Sichuan restaurant, but rather what the country is buying. What are they buying? Lots and lots of cheap fossil fuels from Africa. Africa? Africa. Sanisha, it’s equally up to your continent to not sell fossil fuels to the Chinese! But of course this is a nonsense, it’s illogical, because African mineral and oil rich states need to sell something.

    You guys are arguing against economics, which won’t solve anything. Humanity likes to maximise its utility, which means choosing the cheaper option for energy resources. What’s needed is economic disincentives to buy fossil fuels, and economic incentives to develop alternatives. This is what the global governance on global warming has been doing incompletely, and is doing to an increasing degree now. But as I said before, the economics absolutely needs China and India, Africa, and the big mineral/oil-rich South American states.

  6. Sanisha says:

    Saleem, do you know who we have not implicated here, who for some reason has slipped off the radar…the Russians!

    They are the largest oil producers in the world, after Saudi Arabia. Like you say though, it’s about who is buying that oil, and why, and not what they are eating.

  7. Original Sin says:

    Shotgun on their skin when the polar bears die.

  8. Saleem says:

    Shotgun on Sina’s skin when we skin him alive.

  9. Sanisha says:

    no no, give Sina a fur coat…he will just need some gold capped teeth to match, and a few rings encrusted with blood diamonds.I think they call this ‘bling’.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

all content
© by The Neocrats .
design & code
© by nemoDreaming.com.

The Neocrats is proudly powered by WordPress.

Feeds:
Entries (RSS), Comments (RSS)

. 2009 Medical Weblog adult downloads