Gideon Rachman does it again.
Bookmark: 
( no ratings yet )
Loading ...Gideon Rachman does it again.
Bookmark:
I love Sina’s world, which leaves no room for praise and construes compliments always as sucking up. He lives in a narrow grey dimension, everyone, where everything is suspect and ulterior, where nothing is sincere!
Also known as “reality”.
(You might have heard about it Sal, in between reading the Guardian and cycling on the South Bank.)
What’s unreal about either the Guardian or the South Bank? Or, for that matter, bicycles?
Bicycles are real, people, they are real.
Too real. Cycling in London has yielded already four instances of near injury!
Four times!! you were probably thinking about Gideon Rachman, again.
Without invoking a debate on the reality and nature of this life, let me just clear up my initial point. My reference was to someone who lives a life far removed from the traditional wage earning cycles, a life of reading the (undoubtedly left-wing) paper in the morning and going for a cycling trip in the afternoon, to “clear one’s mind” or “buy organic ingredients for ethnic dish I’m preparing this evening for my other unemploy– freelancing friends”, a life so alien to someone who punches the clock, that it colloquially qualifies as unreal.
That’s pretty inaccurate.
As a would-be freelance journalist and writer, it’s true, my life doesn’t correspond to the “wage earning cycle” of punching the clock, though I do obey the grander circadian cycle. This means that I wake up roughly the same time as you - though probably earlier, since reportedly your particular “wage earning cycle” allows you to rock into work circa 11am - and work roughly the same hours, except arguably longer because there’s no reason to stop working, there’s no moment when I can punch out.
Moreover, as a freelance journalist and writer, I couldn’t possibly be doing a good job if I read only one newspaper. One of them happens to be centre-left, though my favourite (yours too, I note) is in fact centre-right. Also, for the record, I don’t usually buy organic, and the last time I checked, the only food you ever eat would have to also be called ethnic. At least I eat a wider variety of ethnic. It’s not all meat and rice, my brown-skinned friend.
I would also like to dispute the use of the word “traditional”. A life lived according to the “wage earning cycle” (give or take 11am starts) is not traditional, it’s conventional. I think it’s fair to say, without any intention at being pompous or self-aggrandizing, that I’m not conventional. I’m not a Lopez-esque butterfly flying on the winds of time, either, but I walk a middle road. As such, I’m more disposed to a career that allows me to move in different directions.
And this brings me to the crescendo. A conventional life is no more real than an unconventional life. The only possible way that one could argue that a conventional life is more real than an unconventional one, is if by sheer force of the majority, conventionality had greater reality than unconventionality. But to argue that unconventionality is not real because it is less frequently found, would be to deny the entire experience, knowledge, aspiration, and impact of the unconventional person.
Let’s think about that for a moment. If we were to deny the entire experience, knowledge, aspiration, and impact of the unconventional person, then here are just a few names off the top of my head, whom we can immediately discount from reality because they were unconventional.
- Albert Einstein
- Nelson Mandela
- Pablo Picasso
- Bill Gates
- William Shakespeare
And the list would go on. PLEASE DO NOT MISUNDERSTAND ME. By identifying these people as unconventional, and also myself as unconventional, I do by no means intend to equate myself with those illustrious personages. But my point is that if unconventionality were not real, and therefore these people’s lives were not real, then we would have to live without the following advances:
- general and special relativity, which had practical implications towards nuclear energy, and pure implications towards both the refinement of Newtonian physics and the discovery of quantum physics
- the end of Apartheid in South Africa and the beginning of majority black rule
- Cubism
- Microsoft and the resulting information and productivity revolution around the world
- the heart and soul of literature
So. The “wage earning cycle” is real. The “freelancing” cycle is real. Both are real to their respective people, and for either to claim that the other is unreal is both silly and ungenerous.
I fear no one will ever read this last rant, but its worth the effort.
It’s no rant, I was completely measured in my tone.
I’m with Mogogo here, keep comment-rants to one, perhaps two paragraphs tops. Summarize. Satirize. Um, something-ize.
…plagiarise.
I will write at whatever length I so choose!
HO: Good one.
Is someone accusing me of plagiariam?
They are just jelous.
They are just jelous.
plagiariam: To plagiarize a voice.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
all content
© by The Neocrats .
design & code
© by nemoDreaming.com.
The Neocrats is proudly powered by WordPress.
Feeds:
Entries (RSS),
Comments (RSS)
“World’s feeblest attempt at brown-nosing” would also be an apt title, at least to the comments of the abovementioned post.