“O man of two visions!”

by Saleem - October 9th, 2006
why read this?!fairly good.interesting...GREAT READ!oh give us MORE of this!!! ( 4 votes, average: 4 / 5 )
Loading ... Loading ...

The sky is falling, the British are coming, the end is nigh. Crazy Kim Jong-Il has taken a break from running Stalin’s Disneyland, and triggered a nuclear explosion. Perhaps it’s one of the new rides. “We just wanted to make sure it works,” the North Koreans say, “Because if Japan suddenly goes back on the blob, we need to be ready.” I feel the same, but there is a difference. Mr Kim is toying with his serfs until they froth, snap and try to bite off his hand. When they do, he will nuke them. This is everyone’s mistake: Tokyo and Seoul are worried that fire will fall on their heads, but that’s not it: the nuclear warhead is for going out in style when the bailiffs finally knock on the door. It brings a new meaning to mutually assured destruction.

I ought to be developing my own deterrent. My intention is not that of one over-zealous science student in the United States, who built a nuclear reactor in his backyard and irradiated a neighbourhood. Rather, I have been boxing with opponents over the past weeks – they were bad writing, job rejections, friends I was avoiding, and asking again old questions with no answers – and the match is unfinished. But I think my soul is panting on the canvas of the ring, tired and throwing in the towel. The sky is falling, the British are coming, the end is nigh.

And this is the trick. It is also why mutually assured destruction – MAD – is an even better acronym than we know. “Close one eye and open the other,” Bahá’ís are taught. Mr Kim and I share many things: love of film, high unemployment and bouffant hair. But looking at these indicators only shows reality askew. If I close this eye, the one that fiddles with my hair, thinks Fight Club is divinely inspired and is experiencing career panic, then I am left with a choice of blindness, or that other eye, the one that looks not to the obviousness of my condition but its inner truth. The second eyelid is still fluttering open, just now waking up, but some glimmers are available.

“Close one to the world and all that is therein, and open the other to the hallowed beauty of the Beloved.” Bahá’ís are big fans of tests. Everything is a test. In North Korea, it’s a nuclear detonation test. For me, it’s a test of purpose and composition. Not simply why am I, but what am I. And the answers have been lacking because I’ve been looking at the fight with the wrong eye; the other one is swollen shut. When looked at properly, it turns out that I’m the only one in the ring, and I don’t need a deterrent against the world, because it’s only ever a battle against the self. Punching oneself in the face eventually gets exhausting, black eyes abound and nothing is visible. What I need is a deterrent against myself. Mr Kim needs the same. The sky is falling, the British are coming, the end is nigh.

19 Responses to ““O man of two visions!””

  1. Original Sin says:

    Very close to genius. Remove, put in in a drawer, re-read in two weeks, update, publish.

    /my €0.02

  2. Mogogo says:

    prose-poem.

  3. Sanisha says:

    Saleem, this may not mean much to you, but I think that your showing us this side of yourself is really refreshing > honesty is often not appreciated, it exposes you, allows people to ‘see’ you and your fragility, and it reminds them of their own.

    I think that you describe the Fight brilliantly, it’s cool that you can mark these stages in your life, and as a Bahá’í, by events around us which provoke thought …of impending doom, of gaining power over oneself , and power in the world in general.

  4. Saleem says:

    Hey, thanks a lot guys, I didn’t expect it to be so well received and am very grateful. Sanisha, yes I suppose it’s good to talk about one’s concerns from time to time, and that’s what was trying to write itself for the past two weeks, but it was all weak or I’d done it before. Only in the past twenty-four hours did I get some refreshment that helped me write this post.

  5. Humble Owl says:

    The only thing I could possibly think of improving about this piece is the fact that you don’t ‘tap out’ in a boxing match ( I like to see writers a little more consistant with their chosen metaphors otherwise it can look like they’re not paying attention). Tapping out is usually done in wrestling bouts in which case it wouldn’t be canvas but a mat….Unless it’s WWE.

    Appologies, I commend you for this…(muddled fighting metaphors aside). I think you may have lifted the bar a little.

  6. Saleem says:

    Owl, many thanks as well, that’s very very kind. Thanks also for alerting me to the mixed metaphor. Mixed metaphors are almost always bad (unless employed for comic effect) because, as you say, they detract from the internal reality of the piece. I shall endeavour to correct it with proper phrasing.

  7. Sarmad says:

    The use of repeated sentences is virtuosic. Salaam.

  8. Marshn says:

    There is a reason I keep reading your writing. It’s good. Thanks.

  9. Saleem says:

    Sarmad, brilliant, well-remembered, thanks. Marshn, thank you too, very kind.

  10. Mogogo says:

    Stop taking bows, you freakin dotard.

  11. Saleem says:

    How unfair! There’s a difference between taking bows and offering palms joined in namaste. It was a helpful thing to write and I’m glad people enjoyed it.

  12. Mogogo says:

    There’s also a difference between offering palms joined in namaste and saying “it was a helpful thing to write” / “people enjoyed it”

  13. Saleem says:

    I’m not sure what exactly that difference is, but anyway I suspect you’re right insofar as my intent has been misunderstood.

  14. Original Sin says:

    /finds out what namaste means and chuckles

    http://www.answers.com/namaste

  15. Sanisha says:

    As an appendix, Saleem, please elaborate…

    on why exactly is Mr Kim his own worst enemy? if we go back to the puppet show analogy what role might he be playing ?

    and

    is ‘mutually assured destruction’ … a military term ?
    your mutual referring to North Korea and The World…or North Korea and Mr Kim …other? i don’t quite understand what you meant in para1.
    …what’s the deal there?

  16. Saleem says:

    MAD, mutually assured destruction, is a political-military concept held over from the Cold War. It’s the notion that neither side (back then, the Soviet bloc on one side and NATO on the other) would instigate a nuclear war, because it knew that the other would retaliate with equal or greater nuclear force, and everyone would end up dead. Destruction was assured by mutual capacity and willingness, in face of adequate danger.

    Meanwhile, Mr Kim is his own worst enemy because he’s nuts. His country and regime suffer not because of the machinations of a correct capitalist empire, but because his psychotic ultra-Stalinist state is completely unfeasible for human life, and however well Mr Kim is insulated from the sufferings of his people at the moment, the conditions he (and his father before him) have created are completely untenable for the entire country.

    Further, the way I was using MAD with regards to my own entry and thinking was, I think, partly a joke: that if Mr Kim detonated nuclear weapons against his own people, it would kill them (which is what his economic and politic policies are already doing, albeit more slowly) but also, by killing them, kill himself.

    Finally, I think MAD applies to myself because there is a kind of madness in MAD (that’s why it’s such a good acronym) but when it’s one’s own assured destruction, self-assured destruction - SAD - then it’s even crazier, even more mad. And by then including this notion of “o man of two visions”, i.e. one person, two perspectives - in other words, a struggle within the self of the right way to see the world and one’s life - the notion that self-destruction is the mutually assured destruction of two points of view in one person becomes very compelling simply from a literary point of view. Regrettably for me and you I’ve mangled it far more in this attempt to explain it, but in short, what I was trying to say is that there is, absolutely, a big battle to be had, but it’s internal and unique to each of us, and that any big nuclear-esque deterrent that we might wield against ourselves is sad, mad and… bad.

  17. Sanisha says:

    rad!

    thanks.

  18. nemoDreamer says:

    Mogogo, I’m re-visiting Saleems greats, and this one is a shining example…

  19. Mogogo says:

    prose-poem

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

all content
© by The Neocrats .
design & code
© by nemoDreaming.com.

The Neocrats is proudly powered by WordPress.

Feeds:
Entries (RSS), Comments (RSS)

my downloads most popular today soft updates horace andy and patrick andy tom and jerry richard shindell farnelli vs zi-ko heaven http://aciteglegrife.com/ simon reverb I like this! blog mp3 share here bombasteg for svasteg You are viewing Navigate Payments imdb fans golden b.c. greger hillman funky groove Fallout 3 free download free software downloads Ne kirzachi, no mp3