Proofs of Stupidity, episode 1: Original Sin.
During one of our many ‘phone conversations, I remarked to Sina that ‘ethicist’ is a job. There are people who are ethicists, who gauge ethical implications and suggest ways to live ethically. He said something crass, vulgar, blinkered and stupid, to the effect that ethicists are not people who make money, which is a measure of their worth.
Probably they don’t make much money; I suppose it depends on how well their books sell. But to presume that the societal worth of a particular job depends on the attendant salary is - check above - crass, vulgar, blinkered and stupid. After all, as a consultant who lays off Home Office workers whilst increasing its running costs, Sina has a decent salary. Trash collectors perform a crucial task for collective hygiene, and make less; perhaps if they took out rubbish people instead of rubbish bins, they would get a big fat raise.













Actually, I don’t make that much, starting salaries in Big 4 are comparatively quite low.
Also, the Home Office “workers” you hail as if I slit their throats, were more like bloated middle management types who are leeches on the public purse and serve little other purpose than constantly falling ill or going on maternity leave.
Finally, nobody is actually hired as an ethicist, they become one, if their moral character is of such disposition and are often awarded the “title” posthumously.
From this list of people labelled as ethicists, if you were to review each and every one of their bios, how many do you think list ethicist under occupation?
http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?dsid=2222&dekey=List+of+ethicists&gwp=11&linktext=list%20of%20ethicists
The only thing “crass, vulgar, blinkered and stupid” is your complete lack of any research before writing something here. This post, along with the Shirley Temple drivel are two recent examples of your ineptitude which inevitably backfires.
/wipes dust off sholder